HUMAN CAPITAL
GARY S.BECKER
Gary Becker's
research program is founded on the idea that the behavior of an individual
adheres to the same fundamental principles in a number of different areas. The
same explanatory model should thus, according to Becker, be applicable in
analyzing highly diverse aspects of human behavior. The explanatory model which
Becker has chosen to work with is based on what he calls an economic approach,
which he has applied to one area after another. This approach is characterized
by the fact that individual agents - regardless of whether they are households,
firms or other organizations - are assumed to behave rationally, i.e.,
purposefully, and that their behavior can be described as if they maximized a
specific objective function, such as utility or wealth. Gary Becker has applied
the principle of rational, optimizing behavior to areas where researchers
formerly assumed that behavior is habitual and often downright irrational.
Becker has borrowed an aphorism from Bernard Shaw to describe his
methodological philosophy: "Economy is the art of making the most of
life".
Becker's
applications of his basic model to different types of human behavior can be
accounted for by distinguishing among four research areas: (i) investments in
human capital; (ii) behavior of the family (or household), including
distribution of work and allocation of time in the family; (iii) crime and
punishment; and (iv) discrimination on the markets for labor and goods.
Gary
Becker's most noteworthy contribution is perhaps to be found in the area of
human capital, i.e., human competence, and the consequences of investments in
human competence. The theory of human capital is considerably older than
Becker's work in this field. His foremost achievement is to have formulated and
formalized the microeconomic foundations of the theory. In doing so, he has
developed the human-capital approach into a general theory for determining the
distribution of labor income. The predictions of the theory with respect to the
wage structure have been formulated in so-called human-capital- earnings
functions, which specify the relation between earnings and human capital. These
contributions were first presented in some articles in the early 1960s and were
developed further, both theoretically and empirically, in his book, Human
Capital, written in 1964.
The
theory of human capital has created a uniform and generally applicable
analytical framework for studying not only the return on education and
on-the-job training, but also wage differentials and wage profiles over time.
Other important applications, pursued by various economists, include a
breakdown into components of the factors underlying economic growth, migration,
as well as investments and earnings in the health sector. The human-capital approach
also helps explain trade patterns across countries; in fact, differences in the
supply of human capital among countries have been shown to have more
explanatory power than differences in the supply of real capital.
Practical
applications of the theory of human capital have been facilitated dramatically
by the increased availability of microdata, for example, panel data, on wages
and different characteristics of labor. This development has also been
stimulated by Becker's theoretical and empirical studies. It is hardly an
overstatement to say that the human-capital approach is one of the most
empirically applied theories in economics today.
Gary
Becker has carried out an even more radical extension of the applicability of
economic theory in his analysis of relations among individuals outside of the
market system. The most notable example is his analysis of the functions of the
family. These studies are summarized in his book, A Treatise on the Family,
written in 1981.
A
basic idea in Becker's analysis is that a household can be regarded as a
"small factory" which produces what he calls basic goods, such as
meals, a residence, entertainment, etc., using time and input of ordinary
market goods, "semi-manufactures", which the household purchases on
the market. In this type of analysis, prices of basic goods have two
components. The first is comprised of the direct costs of purchasing
intermediate goods on the market. The second is the time expenditure for production
and consumption of the good in question for a specific good, this time
expenditure is equivalent to wages multiplied by the time spent per unit of the
good produced in the household. This implies that an increase in the wage of
one member of the household gives rise not only to changed incentives for work
on the market, but also to a shift from more to less time-intensive product on
and consumption of goods produced by the household, i.e., basic goods. Instead
of an analysis in terms of the traditional dichotomy between work and leisure,
Becker's model provides a general theory for the household's allocation of
time, as exemplified in the essay, A Theory of the Allocation of Time, from
1965. This approach has turned out to be a highly useful foundation for
examining many different issues associated with household behavior.
Becker
has gone even further. He has formulated a general theory for behavior of the
family - including not only the distribution of work and the allocation of time
in the family, but also decisions regarding marriage, divorce and children. As
real wages increase, along with the possibilities of substituting capital for
labor in housework, labor is released in the household, so that it becomes more
and more uneconomical to let one member of the household specialize wholly in
household production (for instance, child care). As a result, some of the
family's previous social and economic functions are shifted to other institutions
such as firms, schools and other public agencies. Becker has argued that these
processes explain not only the increase in married women's job participation
outside the home, but also the rising tendency toward divorce; see his article,
Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families (coauthored by N. Tomes),
1986.
Alongside
Becker's analysis of the distribution of labor and allocation of time in the
household, his most influential contribution in the context of the household
and the family is probably his studies on fertility, which were initiated in an
essay entitled, An Economic Analysis of Fertility, 1960. Parents are assumed to
have preferences regarding both the number and educational level of their
children, where the educational level is affected by the amount of time and
other resources that parents spend on their children. Investments in children's
human capital may then be derived as a function of income and prices. As wages
rise, parents increase their investments in human capital, combined with a
decrease in the number of children. Becker uses this theory to explain, for
example, the historical decline in fertility in industrialized countries, as
well as the variations in fertility among different countries and between urban
and rural areas. In particular, the highly extensive family policy in Sweden,
to which Becker often refers, suggests the merits of an economic approach to
the analysis of these issues.
The
third area where Gary Becker has applied the theory of rational behavior and
human capital is "crime and punishment". A criminal, with the
exception of a limited number of psychopaths, is assumed to react to different
stimuli in a predictable ("rational") way, both with respect to
returns and costs, such as in the form of expected punishment. Instead of
regarding criminal activity as irrational behavior associated with the specific
psychological and social status of an offender, criminality is analyzed as
rational behavior under uncertainty. These ideas are set forth, for example, in
Becker's essay, Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach, 1968, and in Essays
in the Economics of Crime and Punishment, 1974.
Empirical
studies related to this approach indicate that the type of crime committed by a
certain group of individuals may to a large extent be explained by an
individual's human capital (and hence, education). These empirical studies have
also shown that the probability of getting caught has a more deterrent effect
on criminality than the term of the punishment.
Another
example of Becker's unconventional application of the theory of rational,
optimizing behavior is his analysis of discrimination on the basis of race,
sex, etc. This was Becker's first significant research contribution, published
in his book entitled, The Economics of Discrimination, 1957. Discrimination is
defined as a situation where an economic agent is prepared to incur a cost in
order to refrain from an economic transaction, or from entering into an
economic contract, with someone who is characterized by traits other than
his/her own with respect to race or sex. Becker demonstrates that such
behavior, in purely analytical terms, acts as a "tax wedge" between
social and private economic rates of return. The explanation is that the
discriminating agent behaves as if the price of the good or service purchased
from the discriminated agent were higher than the price actually paid, and the
selling price to the discriminated agent is lower than the price actually
obtained. Discrimination thus tends to be economically detrimental not only to
those who are discriminated against, but also to those who practice
discrimination.
Gary
Becker's analysis has often been controversial and hence, at the outset, met
with scepticism and even distrust . Despite this, he was not discouraged, but
persevered in developing his research, gradually gaining increasing acceptance
among economists for his ideas and methods. A not insignificant influence may
also be discerned in other social sciences. Various aspects of demography
constitute one example, particularly in regard to fertility, parents' efforts
to ensure their children's education and development, as well as inheritance.
Additional examples are research on discrimination in the labor market, and
crime and punishment. But Becker has also had an indirect impact on scientific
approaches in social sciences other than economics; more frequently than in the
past, sociologists and political scientists work with models based on theories
of "rational choice".
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar